> When the NewYorkTimes of all liberal rags, exposed Rush secretly meeting with Schumer and Graham back in 2011 to get the talking points on amnesty... Rush sold out his credibility...
Which talking points are those? I catch part of Rush’s show several times a week, and have for decades. Often I’ve heard him criticize illegal immigration, criticize amnesty, and criticize the idea that Republicans need to accept it as a political strategy (and I know I’ve heard him criticize Schumer by name, and am pretty sure he has criticized Graham by name too — he definitely has opposed the general McCain-Graham approach to politics). What has he said to counter that?
> A signal to the money man Rush would be for NOBODY to tune into him tomorrow...But that won’t happen, too many still consider him a voice of conservatism...
Could that be because he has been one, going back to 1984 in Sacramento, more than 30 years? When I hear him supporting amnesty, then I’ll believe he has changed his view. I haven’t heard it.
Neither Cruze or Rubio are even ‘Constitutionally’ eligible to hold the office of president.... But now the Constitution does not even matter to Rush... Rush use to claim that Cruz follows the ‘original intent’ of the Constitution... But no more, now Cruz is called the ‘consistent conservative’... Lies upon lies upon lies.