No, his “right” isn’t beside the point. It is the entire point, because his right to speak is what justifies the use of force to ensure he can.
He has a right to speak. But has he a right to use a specific tactic? He appeals to the gut rather than to the head,and naturally the reactions to him, positive and negative are going to be from the gut. He never argues, which his why his performance sin the debates are just extensions of his rally performances. It is all “trust”. From my perspective it is: trust to do what? I am reminded of Ross Perot. If you recall what he was saying, then, he was warning against Bush’s New World Order stuff. Only, when it got down to that,Perot really didn’t have any ideas of what else ought to be done. Further, he didn’t trust Clinton either. His main aim was to block Bush but when he came back in it is to elect Clinton as the lesser of the two evils. I know the negative things that Trump wants to be but not really what positive things he wants to do. Back in 2008, I KNEW what Obama was join got do. Thank God we were able to stop some of the stuff, but here we have a Trump whose like Perot except he likes the idea of being top dog.