Thank you. So, when those cases get decided in the other states, please let me know what those judges say. From what I read in the order, I do not understand why Cruz contested standing. I don’t see why he would not just prefer to go ahead and get a decision and remove any possible impediments. Sometimes lawyers try to do things to keep their client out of the court, but Cruz seems to have a good case, so I don’t know why they didn’t just tee it up and see where the ball landed. What some lawyers will do!
Because Cruz knows what the Constitution says & IMO, he is also hiding damaging info regarding his mother's legal status in Canada at the time of his birth and shortly thereafter. As for the other cases, unless those bringing them use the critical part of the WKA case as well as Justice Gray's deciding opinion in the Elk v. Wilkins case that cites the Slaughterhouse & Happersett cases, none of the ongoing cases stand a chance to win. The 14th is clear, born “IN” & naturalized “IN” the United States and both “subject tot he jurisdiction”. Well, if jurisdiction merely means birth on soil, that phrase is redundant. Jurisdiction means both politically as well as physically on the soil so that one owes no allegiance to any foreign power (a.k.a. foreign citizenship).