Posted on 03/10/2016 12:52:09 PM PST by dragnet2
Just trying to get people to understand the simplicity of his statement, since so many are so busy working themselves in knots, making it something, and making Ted, into something they are not.
He said it, he owns it, it's pretty clear what he was saying and that is in its complete context. If you don't believe so, that's fine, let people figure it out for themselves instead of trying to constantly spin it.
CGato
You have no idea who my candidate is.
If your tag line "I calls 'em like I see 'em" is true... it's time for a new set of glasses.
Perhaps true but meaningless.
Oh, and I should note that you just called the Office of the Solicitor General of the State of Texas that of a “flunky.” That’s the guy who is in charge of arguing the state’s position to the state’s highest court and the U.S. Supreme Court... pretty much reserved for the brightest legal mind of the correct party.
It is not headline now, but here is link..
http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/10/ted-cruz-a-bush-by-another-name/
I just love all how people are once again taking it out of context, reading into it what isnt there and starting the usual attacks, because they cant argue it on logic or on its merits.
Cruz is 100% correct in his statement.
What do you get when a Trump supporter vets candidates?
A Cruz supporter
“All the people” did not take Cruz statement out of context ~ I did not like Cruz statement...in context or otherwise.
I am not low information, I am very engaged—been here quite a bit longer than YOU, and I suspect I have posted more articles too. I have gone to one Trump Rally, and I am going to another one tomorrow. I would go to a Cruz forum, but they are fundraisers and I cannot afford the $120+ plate dinner. How many candidate forums have you attended?
I find it interesting that all of a sudden now Cruz seems to be saying it is not OK to be angry....Huh?—I have been angry since 2007, and I don’t think that is a bad thing.
I am most concerned about our Liberty and National Sovereignty. I have vetted the candidates. A year ago, Trump was the one and the only candidate that cared about immigration...he put it on the table—as well as the border security issue. At the debate tonight, all the candidates are now talking about immigration, visas, walls...None of this would have been discussed had Trump not run. Yes, I have vetted the candidates, and I believe Trump is the guy to change the status quo.
I don’t appreciate your stereotypical put down of me and other Freepers who support Trump.
If your candidate isn’t Trump - then your candidate is a liar., Simple as that, whether it be Cruz or Rubio. Not sure about Kasich except his dad was a mailman.
I should have phrased it differently. What I meant, was something in general about all people and when I said being uninformed about anything, I meant being informed on anything, in general. Not just about elections or candidates or politics. Just any topic.
I was making a general statement, not geared toward any specific people. Thats why I said people and not Trump supporters.
Sorry.
No problem, we're good. :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.