Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

No.

GWB did not lie.

Iraq not only had WMD but also used them and many chemical warheads were later found Iraq after coalition forces liberated that country.

If chemical weapons are considered WMD, GWB was definitely not lying.


5 posted on 03/08/2016 12:42:38 PM PST by Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Trapped Behind Enemy Lines
'Iraq not only had WMD but also used them and many chemical warheads were later found Iraq after coalition forces liberated that country.'

Old wmd from the Iran/Iraq war[that later the Bush admin didn't take responsibility in medically helping our boys] was not reason enough to 'invade' Iraq, nor was the destability of the region weighed against Iraq even having new weapons.

No matter how bad SH was, he still was more of a stabilizing force than we ever could have become, and a natural bulwark against Iran.

Nor was the costs of the invasion ever properly explained or reasoned. We will be paying for those miscalculations for generations.

Not only that but there has been no public review of the policies and practices of the intelligence failure in supporting such a intervention, nor has anyone been held accountable for such actions. As with the typical government actions.

33 posted on 03/08/2016 3:27:00 PM PST by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson