Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/07/2016 9:20:06 AM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: Hojczyk

Not targeting the original poster, but this seems to be a compilation of existing stories from the last three days.

Not a lot of new news coming. It is almost like someone is leaking the stories intentionally. /sarc


90 posted on 03/07/2016 10:48:27 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Ask Bernie supporters two questions: Who is rich. Who decides. In the past, that meant who died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Another thing to note, if they have given him immunity, he can’t “plead the 5th” again, he will have to testify, or go to jail for contempt until he does.


92 posted on 03/07/2016 11:01:04 AM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
Would be if the Department of Justice wasn't politicized.

It depends on whether Obama thinks Hillary is the only Democrat who can win, or if he thinks someone else could do so (Bernie, Fauxcahontas, or Biden), and that he could throw Hillary under the bus without her being able to inflict a lot of damage on him. He hates Hillary but wants a Democrat to be the next President so that his own "achievements" are not rolled back, and so that the SC will have a permanent left-wing majority.

93 posted on 03/07/2016 11:03:11 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Even if the classified material issue can be dodged, and I doubt it can, she is not above the law, this could still get away from her.

If the motivation or “convenience” for having the private server was in any way related to Hildabeast’s intention to run for President, then this may have legs.

Obama made Hillary SecState to “...keep his enemies closer”, and Hillary was promised. A lot of things. One of which was protection, IMHO. Indictment or Pardon, if she is denied her presidency, SHE just might be granted immunity in her exposure of greater crimes with bigger fish...But... The potential collapse of the Clinton dynasty and the Obama nightmare in one massive scandal is probably too much to hope for.


96 posted on 03/07/2016 11:06:32 AM PST by Wildbill22 (They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton Williams Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

“Third, the Justice Department would only grant immunity if information that Mr. Pagliano possesses about a more significant crime outweighed the crime that he committed and if it was in the public interest to do so.”

Normally this would probably be true. But with this justice department it could be a ploy to actually silence a witness. The guy only has to answer a question that they actually ask. And if he has immunity then no one else will be able to ask him questions.


98 posted on 03/07/2016 11:10:09 AM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Who are these Shirley Temple journalists cascading off the back of the turnip truck?


101 posted on 03/07/2016 11:18:18 AM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
Well, Mr. Pagliano’s connection to the case is that he set up and maintained the email server at Mrs. Clinton’s request,

I am waiting for the "I will not be a scapegoat" statement by him.

107 posted on 03/07/2016 11:34:23 AM PST by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk
First, Mr. Pagliano would only need immunity from prosecution if he had broken the law.

That's not true. They granted him immunity because they wanted to talk to him about the server and he had no reason to talk without having immunity.

Any good lawyer will advise clients not to talk to law enforcement without immunity.

To fully understand the story behind the server the FBI needs to talk to someone who knows about it. This guy is the best candidate. It is still possible that when they fully understand the whole story, they will decide that Hillary is either not gong to be prosecuted or will get a slap on the wrist. You can't tell from this granting of immunity to one person that Hillary is "going to jail".

111 posted on 03/07/2016 11:48:29 AM PST by wideminded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

I’m not holding my breath. She will never go to jail. Even if she is indicted Obama would pardon her. Besides, she will bring down some Republicans with her.


119 posted on 03/07/2016 12:22:30 PM PST by 38special (For real, y'all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

Clintons don’t go to jail. They just don’t.
There is a club, and it pays to be a member.


121 posted on 03/07/2016 12:28:00 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Hojczyk

“Hillary’s America” Trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7e6gLht6OQ


125 posted on 03/07/2016 2:46:29 PM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson