Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Conservative Con (Master Persuader Series)
Dilbert.com ^ | 3/7/2016 | Scott Adams

Posted on 03/07/2016 7:53:41 AM PST by GilGil

Under the 2D filter of life, conservatives are united by a common ideology that is supported by reason. But under the Master Persuader filter, conservative is a word created for the purpose of identity persuasion. Nothing more. According to my filter, conservative has no logical or coherent reason for existing. While I assume it once had a noble birth, at this point it is just a hodgepodge of ideas that disagree with Democrats. Some of the individual ideas have merit, but they don’t belong together in the same bag for any reason that is obvious to me.

(Excerpt) Read more at blog.dilbert.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016; conservative; election; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: GilGil

17 years here and you write that? Interesting.

For me it’s simple: Limited government, unfettered liberty, fiscal responsibility and fair trade.


41 posted on 03/07/2016 11:33:34 AM PST by polymuser (Enough is enough!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

You completely missed my point. I know what communism was about.

One of the tenets of conservatism is keeping things like they were. My point is that there has to be more than that otherwise communism would be conservatism at least according to some who wish things were as they were under the Soviet Union.


42 posted on 03/07/2016 11:33:56 AM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

It’s a start.


43 posted on 03/07/2016 11:35:49 AM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: GilGil
If all you got out of hang on to the good from the past; don’t accept the “new” simply because it sounds good, critique it on the basis of the common experience of mankind; allow the peculiarities that have grown up as a result of history to survive if not flourish, rather than imposing “rational” solutions on everything...accept that life is tragic is "keeping things like they were", there really isn't any point in answering you any more.

Read Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France, or Russell Kirk's The Conservative Mind.

44 posted on 03/07/2016 11:48:32 AM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

You are making my point over and over again.

You simply cannot tell me in your own words what conservatism is. You are saying that you are too busy to explain it and to read a bunch of books.

That is what is wrong with most conservatives. They have no idea what it means in simple terms and in order to appear smart and superior they call you stupid and refer you to a bunch of books.

That is why conservatism is failing.


45 posted on 03/07/2016 11:58:36 AM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GilGil
I believe it was my point that a political philosophy cannot adequately be stated in "50 words or less". You have to start from the state of nature, and determine why government is necessesary, and those realms where it should have a say. Once you have carefully proscribed its limits, you have to look at the different ways in which those limits can be maintained over time, and how to balance those few necessary powers against personal liberty, with a heavy hand on the personal liberty side of the discussion, because if you don't government 'needs' (read some busy-body or statists desires), will quickly overpower any liberty an individual might otherwise have.

IMO, you can't go far wrong with using John Locke's Second Treatise on Government as a starting point and build from there.

However, if you'd like something pithy, how about:

I like the non-aggression principle as a starting point as well, but don't particulary care for where some libertarians have taken it.

46 posted on 03/07/2016 12:21:36 PM PST by zeugma (Vote Cruz!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Sounds like a good starting point and is simple enough to understand.


47 posted on 03/07/2016 12:26:45 PM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: GilGil
If it were there would be at least one person who could tell me . . .

Yada, yada, yada. You need to have more than one thing to say. Read that Sobran article from NR's 30th. Yes, read. Find it online. You won't want to put it down.

48 posted on 03/07/2016 12:42:00 PM PST by SamuraiScot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SamuraiScot

Too busy to put it in your own words. Conservatism is going nowhere with that elitist attitude.


49 posted on 03/07/2016 1:02:21 PM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: GilGil
I told you in my own words. Let me quote myself again:
...conservatism is not actually an ideology, but a temperament or attitude that is essentially opposed to ideology: hang on to the good from the past; don’t accept the “new” simply because it sounds good, critique it on the basis of the common experience of mankind; allow the peculiarities that have grown up as a result of history to survive if not flourish, rather than imposing “rational” solutions on everything...; accept that life is tragic...
You did not seem to like this, but that is what there is. The suggested readings from the Anglo-American strain of conservatism are pointed to by me and others on the thread because if you don't believe my definition, you can find confirmation of it by reading Kirk, Burke, and Acton, not because the definition I gave is insufficient.
50 posted on 03/07/2016 1:55:41 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David

Sounds like you are describing common sense.


51 posted on 03/07/2016 2:00:05 PM PST by GilGil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Not surprising that: what was once considered common sense is not so common, and those who remember what it is tend to be conservatives. In some ways conservatism is to society (or societies) what common sense used to be to individuals.


52 posted on 03/07/2016 2:02:46 PM PST by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: GilGil
I suggest you tell me in 50 words or less what conservatism is.

Respect for family, nation and tradition. Subsidiarity. Understanding history and the contingent nature of institutions but never using this to "deconstruct" or undermine them. Accepting the nature of man. Rejection of grand schemes for remaking society. Individualism moderated by patriotism, reconciling the citizen's interests with the greater good.

From these can be derived opposition to abortion, support for free enterprise, support for a strong military and countless other specifics.

53 posted on 03/07/2016 3:41:34 PM PST by MaxFlint
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson