Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LibFreeUSA

That’s my take as well. I think it perhaps was not articulated clearly by Mr. Trump, but I believe he meant to express that under his leadership, our military would no longer have its hands tied with regulations and Rules of Engagement which prevent us from aggressively going after terrorists on the battlefield and which work against the safety of our personnel in the field.


105 posted on 03/04/2016 12:18:15 PM PST by Crolis ("To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it." -GKC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Crolis

It would be excellent to push Mr. Trump to be clear on this, because of the danger of meaning something that we all know is wrong. Not so excellent to get our hair on fire before he does.

And in any case to believe he wouldn’t get mongo pushback from military advisors if he adopted the worst take, is not to be realistic.


108 posted on 03/04/2016 12:21:20 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson