Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bogie

“No chance”?

That’s not how probabilities work. The likely distance from Earth at the object’s closest approach can be plotted as a bell curve. The asteroid’s “best fit” orbit projects passage at 2.8 million miles away. It is said it “may” get as close as 19,000 miles, or, putting it another way, it may stray as close as 2.781 million miles away from the “best fit”, toward the Earth. If there is a 0.01% chance that the asteroid will come as close as 2.781 million miles from “best fit”, then the odds it will stray as close as 2.8 million miles from “best fit” are only slightly lower.

BTW, is the text you cite old data? A range of 21-52 meters diameter is fairly significant: We are looking at (assuming the thing does at least collide destructively with Earth’s atmosphere), on the low end, a Chelyabinsk type event, and on the high end, almost 18 times as much energy released as the Chelyabinsk event. (This assumes incoming velocity is the same — if this baby is coming in significantly faster, that increases the energy yield too. (The Chelyabinsk meteor, B4 it hit the atmosphere, is calculated to have been traveling at ~ 19 km/s, just over “average.)

Another way to look at it is that the Barringer crater meteorite is estimated to have been 50m diameter, with an impact speed of 12.8 km/s. Chelyabinsk is estimated at 500 kilotons, Barringer is estimated at 10 megatons, or a 20x bigger bang: not too far off my 18x calculation above.

The atmosphere slows down “little ones” more, assuming equal angles of entry, but, then, Chelyabinsk did not make it through the atmosphere, luckily for the locals! If it had come in near vertical at a city...

At any rate, should our new friend defy the odds and land on, say, me, the “bang” is going to be serious.


70 posted on 02/29/2016 9:27:48 PM PST by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Paul R.

Interesting related article about a 2012 “Euro” fireball:

http://sattrackcam.blogspot.nl/2012/09/more-on-21-september-2012-fireball-why.html


71 posted on 02/29/2016 9:34:12 PM PST by Paul R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Paul R.

http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/orbits/

Took the information from the NASA web page.


76 posted on 02/29/2016 10:22:08 PM PST by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

To: Paul R.
"The atmosphere slows down “little ones” more, assuming equal angles of entry, but, then, Chelyabinsk did not make it through the atmosphere."

Well yes, but the Canyon Diablo was nickle/iron. It would ablate differently and have greater kinetic energy than the Chelyabinsk type event. When the Barringer meteorite was finally found, as I remember,on the south rim of the crater, it had a diameter of nineteen feet.

BTW, a small piece of Chelyabinsk did make it into a frozen lake.

There is a basic formula, that I don't remember right now, but it states that a body has a chance of making it to earth if it enters the atmosphere with a weight of over eight tons.

Anyhow, enjoy the NASA web site.

80 posted on 02/29/2016 10:47:03 PM PST by Bogie (Just a coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson