Replies

I hate Hillary but this is weak.

Bullet hole in one side of neck but no exit wound? Very weak bullet, and it must be in the body, but the autopsy didn’t locate it.

Sounds more like a puncture wound from falling after the suicide shot.

Moved bodies are easy to discern.

For all of this to be covered up would require too large a conspiracy of local people. It’s not believable.

I'm not disagreeing with you. But as to "For all of this to be covered up would require too large a conspiracy of local people. It’s not believable." Seymour Hersh had a reply to that common response to conspiracy theories. He noted how many thousands of NSA employees/contractors had access to everything Snowden did and more, yet said nothing. Arguably, it was their duty to point out that the NSA was doing illegal stuff. But only Snowden did.

It's not the '70s anymore. Americans don't like whistle blowers.

I hate Hillary but this is weak.

Not sure how your definition of weak stacks up to the "beyond a reasonable doubt" standard of proof, but eyewitness testimony raises doubt whether the Honda Civic at the scene described as belonging to Foster was even the same year and color of Foster's Honda Civic. The FBI's 503 investigative report changed the witness's testimony on this point to match the official story. This discrepancy was uncovered by Evans Ambrose Pritchard and is a large part of what prompted Patrick Knowlton and his lawyer to file the Knowlton Appendix. Can't say what HRC's involvement was in all this, but rest assured the case to be made against the official story of suicide is anything but weak.

http://allanfavish.com/index.php/vincent-foster
You can read the facts for yourself in my brief on the merits to the Supreme Court at the bottom of page 19 to the top of page 40. None of the facts were proven false, inaccurate or misleading. The documents cited in the brief are here (see the documents linked at the listings for May 30, 2001 & October 9, 2001). If you read it all, compare it to the one sentence in the entire Supreme Court opinion about the evidence you just read: “Favish has not produced any evidence that would warrant a belief by a reasonable person that the alleged Government impropriety might have occurred to put the balance into play.” This sentence is on page 17 of the opinion, which is here. Note that the Supreme Court briefs do not contain the original source citations, but only citations to the “Excerpts of Record”. You can see the original source citations in my Appellant’s Opening and Reply briefs, which were filed April 13 and August 31 of 1998 with the Ninth Circuit, links to which are here.

The motion to compel deposition testimony from Rodriguez and his assistant is here, under the date January 19, 2001: http://allanfavish.com/index.php/vincent-foster/173-foia-lawsuit-to-obtain-foster-investigation-photos

he was shoeless yet had no grass nor soil on his feet....they never found the bullet although they were able to find several bullets from the Civil war....

I'm sure he was murdered or at least committed suicide at a very inappropriate place but I am satisfied we'll know be given the truth....

we're just the peons....we pay and we obey...no questions please...