You’re missing the point
The point is that for all of you New York Times supportbots to trash Rush for eating a supper with political opponents is the most asinine syllogism I’ve heard on hear. The discussion of political positions on amnesty is just that. And there is no evidence from any remarks made by Rush, that he is in support of amnesty.
I wonder if Trump ever has lunch with people with whom he disagrees? I don’t hear about it, so if he did, it can only mean he is making deals with them...have I got the reasoning down now?