[nathanbedford]

If you read my post closely you will note that I did not say that Fox was fair and balanced and I certainly did not say that I "believe Fox is the epitome of their slogan, "fair and balanced." I simply said that critics don't want a fair and balanced network which is a different thing.

In reaching the conclusions that many FReepers don't want "fair and balanced" I think I did so by way of my powers of observation and reasoning and I don't think I did so "hysterically."

It appears you have not made a cogent point with your post. Try again.

It rather it appears that it is not I who has failed to make a cogent point but you who has failed to comprehend the plain meaning of the English language. Having made those blunders it is even more obnoxious of you to condescend with "Try again."

[ConservativeMind]

Critics do want a “Fair and Balanced” network.

Stop lying.

[jjsheridan5]

In reaching the conclusions that many FReepers don't want "fair and balanced" I think I did so by way of my powers of observation and reasoning and I don't think I did so "hysterically."

You may or may not have done so "hysterically", but you did do so "incorrectly". Very incorrectly. To the point that your "powers" of observation and reasoning may not be as "powerful" as you thought. The vast majority of people on FR just want fair and balanced journalism that sticks to issues, and doesn't try to drag the presidential process into the mud.

Sorry, but you are very, very wrong in your observation and reasoning.