[DPMD]

“Armed takeover of an area.”

Would that apply to the millions of state acres stolen by the fed, and protected by men with guns? To places like Area 51, and the massive neighborhoods taken over by armed men to accommodate the president’s stupid motorcade? To the White House grounds protected by a massive fenced wall and protected by men with tons of guns, even though they may be drunken whoremongers?

And so on?

[rdcbn]

As a general rule, armed confrontations with governmental employees are not an effective form of dispute resolution in a civil society and are generally counter productive to the resolution of the dispute and destructive to the cause at issue.

[Hulka]

“To places like Area 51”

Area 51? Out of place on the list, don’t you think.

For those that don’t know, airspace over parts of Nevada are used for Red Flag exercises, training flights, continuation training, Weapons School syllabus flights, search and rescue exercises (CSAR), etc. You know, the military you thank for their service are honing their skills there.

So, that means the airspace is necessary to fly these missions and by doing so over the desert, you are flying over areas that disrupt the least amount of people, especially important because some of those exercises involve hundreds of jets in the same general airspace.

The airspace is divided up and assigned a number and Area 51 is a chunk of airspace over Groom Lake, the base.

Basically, Area 51 is “air” and Groom Lake is “ground.”

This airspace and the base are necessary to ensure the best trained, most capable pilots, and advanced classified R&D is accomplished to ensure we have a significant qualitative edge over all others.

Surely that is a good thing.