Read the source article. In detail.
The jobs are at a high price resort, the kind of place where everything isn’t just perfect, but glorious & exotic.
The jobs are for direct personal service, such as “banquet server”.
Now, comparing the article’s photos of someone who got the job vs someone who didn’t, and considering the position, it’s OBVIOUS why the depicted whiner didn’t, and the hiree did: the whiner has a mundane pout, and the hiree is one of the most beautiful and exotic women I’ve ever seen.
Remember, Trump runs elusive resorts, and ran the Miss America Competition. For some jobs he’s hiring for, “mundane and domestic” looks ARE a job criteria.
But no the NY Times had to make it sound like he was hiring for dishwasher and being anti American about it.
As for “but there’s suitable Americans willing to do those jobs”, supply and demand. Or maybe you want a veiled minimum wage?
Funny how you can rationalize everything away...
How about all those foreign workers that built his “exotic” buildings? They were needed to the “exotic” construction???
Trump being a businessman excuses everything it seems.
Praising low life communists that will damage a large number of peoples lives because doing business called for it is a-okay...
Donating big bucks to Hillary’s senate campaign and to the Clinton foundation was just doing good business. Never mind the consequences for everyone else...
Buying politicians and therefore engaging in political corrupt is simply how business is done. Trump even brags about it.
Trying to take someones private property using eminent domain for your personal gain is just how business is done you say...
Hiring illegals and foreigners to make a buck is just how business is done...
Perhaps we should want someone who does “business” differently.