Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: patlin

“The 16th Amendment ‘income tax’ is 100% constitutional.”

The rest I leave to ponder. Here, on the other hand, we will disagree.

Set aside the ratification debate (for punctuation *can* radically alter the meaning; just look at what they try to do w/ the 2nd verbiage). The 16th blatantly violates the 4th, 5th and 13th Amendments. There is NO over-riding verbiage in the 16th as there is with the 21st. Void, on its face.


156 posted on 02/26/2016 10:04:14 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies ]


To: i_robot73
The 16th blatantly violates the 4th, 5th and 13th Amendments

You cannot just put out a blanket statement like the one above without telling me specifically, why YOU believe that statement to be true.

How does the 16th Amendment violate a persons right to be secure in their persons, papers and effects & from unwarranted searches and seizures?

How does the 16th Amendment violate ones 5th Amendment right of due process?

How does the 16th Amendment violate ones right to be free from involuntary servitude?

I have been trough IRS audits and NONE of the above I witnessed to be as you claim them to be, at any time during those audits.

157 posted on 02/26/2016 10:30:52 AM PST by patlin ("Knowledge is a powerful source that is - 2nd to none but God" ConstitutionallySpeaking 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson