To: Oatka
I thought then that I had witnessed the passing of an age, as with all the environmental hoops today, those factories were NEVER coming back.
A clean environment, while desirable, is a very costly proposition. What is that cost? The jobs and payroll associated with the industrial facilities that were forced to close because the costs of compliance with environmental regulations have rendered them uneconomic. And you're right...those jobs cannot and will not ever come back. If those razed facilities were uneconomic 20 years ago, it's not going to make any sense to try and rebuild them from the ground up today, of course.
34 posted on
02/24/2016 11:13:42 AM PST by
Milton Miteybad
(I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
To: Milton Miteybad
Bunk. Those factories moved for cheap labor. The EPA and OHSA were use as scapegoats to fool "movement conservatives" into thinking selling out America was a good thing. Fools.
Thanks Rush for playing your part.
To: Milton Miteybad; central_va
If those razed facilities were uneconomic 20 years ago, it's not going to make any sense to try and rebuild them from the ground up today, of course. It wasn't the environmental problems that shut them down, it was, as central_va commented, "greed and the attraction of third world labor. Getting to sell in a first world market paying third world wages is a good gig if you can keep it."
Aye, there's the rub - when most are living hand-to-mouth, there's no disposable income left for anything but necessities.
76 posted on
02/24/2016 4:38:51 PM PST by
Oatka
(Beware of an old man in a profession where men usually die young.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson