I don’t think that audio is all that bad. I’ve heard worse and been able to make sense of it. You just keep playing the problematic section over and over again, syncing the lip movement to the audio sequence, and at some point the options get pretty limited. For my money, the OP’s analysis seems right. Any FReeper with some serious experience in audio forensics should weigh in and maybe provide some confirmation. It’s an important event, if accurately reported.
Peace,
SR
Very informative post, Springfield Reformer, and you could be right that an expert could weigh in. IMO, it would take an expert . . and I would still be hard to persuade that a crafty politician like Rubio would be so stupid.
Do you realize that the justification that Rubio defamed the Bible publicly lied on the slim premise that he used the word NOT. Did he say ‘Not many answers in that one (pointing to the Bible)? Or could he have said ‘AND many answers in that one (pointing to the Bible). Can you positively discern that first word without a doubt?
Or possibly he said ‘Many answers in that one’ and the video might have made it seem like a little three-letter word was inserted prior to ‘Many answers in that one’.
Not even Bernie Sanders . . with his questionable faith beliefs . . would be so ignorant as to walk up to Hillary’s people and make such a degrading statement about The Book that the majority of Americans consider their most inspirational. It is still the #1 all-time Best Seller.