Yep, it meets the three syllable requirement, and the open lips at the beginning requirement, and makes sense in context. If true, the look on the staffer’s face, which I still see as surprise and disgust, could be attributed to feelings in the staffer independent of the words spoken. It happens here on FR all the time. “Oh, it’s him again.” That sort of thing.
BTW, my understanding is the Cruz campaign is officially rejecting the negative interpretation. That probably puts the last nail in it. That and the vocabulary of the staffer captured in the second video. Sheesh.
Peace,
SR
That is good news.
What bothers me about the alleged 'dirty tricks' that keep happening around Cruz's campaign is that he never fires anyone. Absent that, eventually one has to start assuming that Cruz is at least giving his tacit approval to the things that have gotten them in hot water.
I made that comment up there about Cruz being "busted" again, but in all honesty, i haven't read enough about this one to make that conclusion. But if the original video accusing Rubio of trashing the Bible was pushed/released by a Cruz staffer, then that staffer needs to be fired. That's the only way I and many others will ever think that Cruz is not guilty of, at the very LEAST, looking the other way while his workers engage in unChristian behavior.