‘It is beyond me why the big issue about Cruz isn’t his eligibility problem.’
Well said!
The founders wanted to ensure undivided loyalty to USA.
Anyone who has any ties to another country (by place of birth, by parentage...) will always have a soft spot for that other country.
Case in point -
Rubio - definitely wants to help out people from his father’s country (and other ‘Latinos’), hence the push for Amnesty.
obama - we all see what happened
Cruz - when conflicts arise between Cuba (his father’s country) and USA, at best, he will have a hard time deciding whether to act in the interests of USA or his other country/countries (or outright defend the other country/countries).
Certainly, nbc such as the Clintons are traitors, but their actions are for the love of money, not for the love of any countries.
That is why we need to elect those who have undivided loyalty (nbc) and who have the ability and intention to defend the best interests of USA and its people.
It is easy to choose those who have undivided loyalty (i.e. the nbc of USA as intended by the founding fathers), but it is not easy to determine who will defend the best interests of USA.
We would be wise to be objective in our observation, and, be strategic in weighing the political situation -
Who has the character and strength to do what he says he will do?
What kind of leader do we need now to defeat the media and uniparty?
Not to mention if things were to get ugly between the US and Canada.