Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long; Black Agnes; djstex; mkjessup; RoosterRedux; DoughtyOne; MinuteGal; flaglady47; Amntn; ..
My latest analysis after SC (BTW, Trump has now won an astonishing 380,000 votes in 3 primaries):

So where now? Rubio can't win alone. Cruz can't win alone. They are like Germany in WW I---they each need an ally. But do they gang up on Trump (hating each other as they do)? Or does one deal with the Donald? You know my prediction (and so far I have been right on Trump) from last summer. Cruz and Trump met in NYC twice, an hour and a half each time. They were'n't looking at Jimmy Chu catalogues. The deal then was, I remain convinced, three fold:

1) Keep from attacking each other as long as possible. (Grade: A+). They managed to only say nice things about each other until December. Remarkable. I remember the second debate (I think second) where the moderator tried to get Trump to say something bad about Ted and he said "Oh he's all right. Don't you worry about him."

2) Once they had to fight, they agreed it would be no holds barred. I am sure back in June and July Trump said, "When we come to that point I'm using everything--birth, flip-flops, anything I can," and I'm sure Cruz said "same here. I will call you a liberal, question your values." May the best man win.

3) Where we almost are now: Ted has MUCH more in common with Trump than Rubes: they are both outsiders, despised by the party and elites, pretty much on the same side of the big issues. I think Cruz knows that with Trump he would have a good shot at the Supreme Court. With Rubes, I think he knows he'll be a convenience, completely ignored if they win.

If I am Ted Cruz I give it til Super Tues, but the reality in "deal making" is you have to deal while you have cards to play. If Trump wins many more, Ted's cards will be gone.

228 posted on 02/21/2016 5:39:02 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies ]


To: LS

Always interesting, LS. Thanks.

“3) Where we almost are now: Ted has MUCH more in common with Trump than Rubes: they are both outsiders, despised by the party and elites, pretty much on the same side of the big issues. I think Cruz knows that with Trump he would have a good shot at the Supreme Court. With Rubes, I think he knows he’ll be a convenience, completely ignored if they win.”

Win/win.

Fascinating to see how this plays out.


229 posted on 02/21/2016 5:46:56 AM PST by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: LS
do they gang up on Trump

How did that work out for them?

No politician has survived so much time in the furnace with so little scarring to show for it. His negatives all relate to the beating he gave those who did it to him.

Talk about tempering. I can't imagine anyone wanting to try THAT again. Well, in fact, the result of Bush's and GOPe's $100M spend was that Bush said enough already.

235 posted on 02/21/2016 6:17:16 AM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: P-Marlowe

Ping to 228


259 posted on 02/21/2016 11:21:21 AM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: LS

I don’t necessarily believe that Trump and Cruz made a deal. I just don’t.


268 posted on 02/21/2016 12:14:02 PM PST by Catsrus (I callz 'em as I seez 'em)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson