Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Washi

Apple only needs to give the government a read out of what is in the phone.

If the phone yielded to saying supercalifragilisticexpialidocious over it, Apple wouldn’t need to tell anyone about that.


156 posted on 02/19/2016 2:04:39 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck

So then, do I understand correctly that this would not be any more of a “violation” of phone records than in the old days with analog phones?

It was common for police and FBI to “tap” phones or if a crime was committed, request calling records and such from the phone company.

Isn’t this really the same, a legitimate request for records, but in this case some technical intervention is needed, but the principle is the same as asking phone company for the history or details of caller’s activity?


162 posted on 02/19/2016 2:11:54 PM PST by opus1 (undecided)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson