Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
This would be justified in a war context, but it’s being treated in a crime context.

Even assuming you're right that this would be justified in a war context, the problem is that, if this tool is created, the government would not hesitate to use it in other contexts.

Today, they want to unlock a dead terrorist's phone. Tomorrow, it might be a drug dealer. Or someone suspected of insider trading. Or Ammon Bundy. Or you, or me or anyone reading this.

139 posted on 02/19/2016 1:56:13 PM PST by zedee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: zedee

They want APPLE to do it on that one phone. Both Trump and Cruz do. Neither asked for Apple to put this tool into the public or even the government’s hands.


140 posted on 02/19/2016 1:57:54 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

To: zedee

You can say that about government having an atom bomb, too.

The threshold of the Constitution is to declare war, which we have kind of soft pedaled as hostilities, but so far we still know what we mean.

We are looking at the wrong set of issues. We shouldn’t be looking at the how, but at the what.


145 posted on 02/19/2016 1:59:40 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson