Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moonman62
Wow, that was a short clip without room for context or explanation. I wonder why?

1. Because that is the money shot and needs no further explanation.

2. The rest is him blathering on about people dying in the street.
7 posted on 02/18/2016 10:02:21 PM PST by kik5150 (Cruz argued 9 times before Supreme Court judges. Trump argues with beauty pageant judges.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: kik5150

“2. The rest is him blathering on about people dying in the street.”

Play the “blather”.

For some reason this 13 second clip remnds me of the Rubio/Obama Photoshop.


16 posted on 02/18/2016 10:11:24 PM PST by map
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: kik5150

most liberals even avoided the “dying in the streets” bullsh*t. they had to be a howard dean or barbara lee level whackjob before they tried that crap.

he must have seen that “on the shows”


30 posted on 02/18/2016 10:25:23 PM PST by JohnBrowdie (http://forum.stink-eye.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: kik5150
1. Because that is the money shot and needs no further explanation.

2. The rest is him blathering on about people dying in the street.

At least he managed one understandable phrase. Normally you can't make sense out of his word salads.

166 posted on 02/19/2016 2:30:23 AM PST by St_Thomas_Aquinas (Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson