To: Moonman62
Wow, that was a short clip without room for context or explanation. I wonder why?
1. Because that is the money shot and needs no further explanation.
2. The rest is him blathering on about people dying in the street.
7 posted on
02/18/2016 10:02:21 PM PST by
kik5150
(Cruz argued 9 times before Supreme Court judges. Trump argues with beauty pageant judges.)
To: kik5150
“2. The rest is him blathering on about people dying in the street.”
Play the “blather”.
For some reason this 13 second clip remnds me of the Rubio/Obama Photoshop.
16 posted on
02/18/2016 10:11:24 PM PST by
map
To: kik5150
most liberals even avoided the “dying in the streets” bullsh*t. they had to be a howard dean or barbara lee level whackjob before they tried that crap.
he must have seen that “on the shows”
30 posted on
02/18/2016 10:25:23 PM PST by
JohnBrowdie
(http://forum.stink-eye.net)
To: kik5150
1. Because that is the money shot and needs no further explanation. 2. The rest is him blathering on about people dying in the street.
At least he managed one understandable phrase. Normally you can't make sense out of his word salads.
166 posted on
02/19/2016 2:30:23 AM PST by
St_Thomas_Aquinas
(Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson