Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: deport
especially property ROW in that short timeframe where there is no border fence currently in place.

I wonder if state and/or federal easements exist there nonetheless? If the border has easements on it now, the the right-of-way to access it should be a standard part of it.

-PJ

29 posted on 02/18/2016 1:57:34 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Political Junkie Too

There already exists a 60’ wide easement along the southern border the Feds own—it was put there by Teddy Roosevelt in 1907.

Temporary construction easements would be needed to access this easement to build the wall. In some areas, there already exists wildlife refuges or wilderness areas, so there are groups who are all upset by someone threatening to build a wall. Of course millions of illegals and drug “mules” have already worn trails through there and drop an unholy amount of trash and human waste along the way—they never seem to complain about that.

So there is already land set aside along the border to build a fence and have a road to patrol it with.


34 posted on 02/18/2016 2:14:03 PM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too
I can't cite details of the actual boundary, etc. However the border in Texas runs about
1255 miles along the Rio Grande. Generally the US/Mexico line is the middle of the river.
However there are two major reservoirs/lakes, Amistad and Falcon. Also where there are
gorges or canyons then fencing is less of a need at this time. In the towns/cities along
the Rio they buildings are built basically up to the river.

All that said it will take planning, commendation proceedings and who knows what else
to ‘get this done. It's doable but not overnight is my opinion.

37 posted on 02/18/2016 2:30:25 PM PST by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

“I wonder if state and/or federal easements exist there nonetheless?”
That’s a darned good question.

https://www.aclu.org/constitution-100-mile-border-zone

As we have come to learn, Trump isn’t shy about 5th amendment taking and the (drumroll plz) ACLU agrees that we can pretty much do anything lawful that we, the American people, want to do in the furtherance of public safety within 100 miles of our borders and coasts.


40 posted on 02/18/2016 2:38:54 PM PST by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: Political Junkie Too

I wonder if state and/or federal easements exist there nonetheless?
*********************
AFAIK, the lands along the Rio Grande in Texas is the private property of the ranchers and farmers... other than that within the Big Bend National Park.

The property owners have access to the river for their livestock and crops. It would cost the gov’t. tons of money to both buy ROW land and provide access to the water.


58 posted on 02/18/2016 6:43:53 PM PST by octex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson