Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AirForceFD

The sarin ied was of a shell type iraq did not possess prior to 1995.
1995 being when the inspectors were kicked out.
The mustard gas is still dangerous even after a century.
And, the existence of the shells show WMD existed.
Try again.


96 posted on 02/18/2016 7:37:22 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare

It’s really quite simple...

It’s a basic understanding of what constitutes an ACTIVE WMD Program.

Nothing you have posted demonstrates that.

We were told that Iraq had an ACTIVE program...i.e. they were in the process of producing chemical weapons and working on possibly building a nuke. NONE of which was true. Remember all the nice little aerial images we were shown by Colin Powell and we were told they were mobile WMD labs? Not true. Wasn’t true at all.

Iraq did NOT have an active WMD program. We were told they did, and thus the urgency of the invasion. That was not true.

You can continue to try and tell us that Iraq had an ACTIVE WMD program, which is again what we were told by the Admin, but it will never be true and pointing to decades old munitions as evidence isn’t supporting that claim in the least.


185 posted on 02/18/2016 9:30:12 AM PST by AirForceFD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson