Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP showing signs of backing down from vow to block Obama SCOTUS pick
The Washington Times ^ | 02/16/16 | Dave Boyer and Stephen Dinan

Posted on 02/16/2016 7:18:26 PM PST by Enlightened1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last
To: Enlightened1

Lost my bet.

I didn’t think the Vichy republicans would cave until the Friday evening news cycle.


41 posted on 02/16/2016 7:34:26 PM PST by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

IMHO they were foolish to ever speak out about blocking a nominee.

It just gave the democtrats ammunition to get the public riled up.

Just say “We will perform our constitutional duties and give every nominee a thorough evaluation.”

Then BORK, BORK, BORK!


42 posted on 02/16/2016 7:36:04 PM PST by Iron Munro (WE MAY BE PARANOID BUT THAT DOESN'T MEAN THEY AREN'T REALLY AFTER US)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

“What else are we going to do?”

Buy ammo, my FRiend, buy ammo. You may need it but it will never lose value if you don’t.


43 posted on 02/16/2016 7:37:00 PM PST by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

the 5th and deciding vote on the supreme court is worth 20 senate seats.


44 posted on 02/16/2016 7:37:18 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Sometimes, I believe that the GOP, aka “The Stupid Party”, is just too hopeless and inept to lead.

WHY did the possibly senile Mitch broadcast his intentions while Scalia’s body was still warm? Why did he say anything at all? Why did anyone say anything at all? Next year will be busy, busy, busy, and maybe the senate would just be too busy to get around tuit. Other than for the purposes of getting a cheap tweek on Obama, there was no reason to bring this up.

Once again, the Dems will get their way AND make the GOP look evil while doing it.

And the real, puke-inducing part of this is that the Chief Obstructor, Harry Reid, took the GOP to task for all of this.


45 posted on 02/16/2016 7:37:29 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarvinStinson

“They all work for the same masters.”

Probably true, I’m afraid.


46 posted on 02/16/2016 7:39:42 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SuzyQue

“We’d better flood the phones tomorrow. “

There would have to be someone on the other end who would actually listen. Even in this era of basically free telecommunication, not worth the time.


47 posted on 02/16/2016 7:41:32 PM PST by The Antiyuppie ("When small men cast long shadows, then it is very late in the day".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

It has to be a mental problem.

There’s a huge freight train headed RINO way, the RINO’s can’t see it, feel the tracks shake, or hear the roar of the loud engine - but it’s gonna run right over them.

The public is tired of them, and will elect Trump.

Many say it could be a bad thing, but the RINO’s brought it on. It’s like saying obama is the greatest gun salesman, meaning anything the RINO’s do only helps Trump.


48 posted on 02/16/2016 7:43:37 PM PST by redfreedom (Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

..Cruz was the first one to say that the Senate should not take up any nominees during Obama’s term.

Thus, I’ll never understand the rise of Trump over Cruz....

Cruz jumped on it literally almost before Scalias body was cold. Enough said.


49 posted on 02/16/2016 7:45:13 PM PST by Sasparilla (Hillary for Prosecution 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: The Antiyuppie

We can do nothing.


50 posted on 02/16/2016 7:53:06 PM PST by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1
we fall into the trap of being obstructionists,

Trap? Their job is to be an obstructionist.

51 posted on 02/16/2016 7:54:12 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Obama will threaten to shut down the government over this nomination and the GOP will fold like they always do.


52 posted on 02/16/2016 7:54:43 PM PST by Helicondelta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

What did I say?


53 posted on 02/16/2016 7:56:57 PM PST by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: umgud

I am sick of this. Obama could pick the most radical and unqualified person and the GOP will meekly roll over and play dead. Any time a Republican president wants someone even slightly conservative for the Supreme Court, the Democrats fight, fight, fight - for months if they have to. The GOP can’t and won’t do anything.


54 posted on 02/16/2016 7:57:07 PM PST by Wilhelm Tell (True or False? This is not a tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Look I am opposed to it but the Senate may play out the clock with confirmation hearings just so they don’t have to endure a daily hissy fit from the Dems and the MSM.


55 posted on 02/16/2016 7:57:30 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sasparilla

Perhaps they are compromised ? Maybe someone has serious dirt on them ...


56 posted on 02/16/2016 7:59:01 PM PST by Neu Pragmatist (Will Cruz endorse Trump or Jeb? That is the question... Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

I think they’re playing politics for public consumption now.

The idea is to be able to say that you’re doing all you are supposed to be doing.

It should include the “advice” part of ‘advise and consent’.

I’d advise the president with a short list of people he should submit. He will turn down their list.

Then return the favor with his list by turning everyone down.

Then send him some more ‘advice’.


57 posted on 02/16/2016 7:59:21 PM PST by xzins (Have YOU Donated to the Freep-a-Thon? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: datura

Wow! That took a long time!


Not surprising!! :(


58 posted on 02/16/2016 8:02:19 PM PST by Freedom56v2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Wilhelm Tell

Hasn’t he already done this twice?


59 posted on 02/16/2016 8:03:35 PM PST by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Enlightened1

Tillis doesn’t have to face the voters for another 4 years...

My guess is the ‘16 crew will be more ... responsive to pressure.


60 posted on 02/16/2016 8:04:36 PM PST by BlueNgold (May I suggest a very nice 1788 Article V with your supper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson