Sometimes I wonder which side she is on.
As for an Article V Convention of States being gimicky — blame the Framers. They put it in there. As for Scalia’s opinion, his comment was about a constitutional convention, not an Article V Convention of states. Ww do not know what he thought about amending the Constitution in order to restore states rights. I can tell you that Schlafly’s plan is only good for as long as brave Republicans control congress. How often does that happen? As soon as it goes to Democrat control the deal is off. The Article V Convention of States liberty amendments would apply at all times no matter who was in control.
Mail.