Skip to comments.
Poll: Nearly 4 In 10 Trump SC Supporters Wish South Won Civil War
The Hill ^
| 16 February 2016
| Harper Neidig
Posted on 02/16/2016 9:42:51 AM PST by zeestephen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-157 next last
To: zeestephen
61
posted on
02/16/2016 10:47:40 AM PST
by
RightGeek
(FUBO and the donkey you rode in on)
To: American in Israel
Had a delegate to do just that, A delegation to end slavery? How has that fact managed to be missed in every single history of the Civil War that has ever been published?
Slavery was always just an excuse. Federalism was always the reason.
I don't think the people in charge of the Confederacy would agree with you. But what did they know?
Interesting study nonetheless.
You do seem to make it more interesting that most.
To: DoodleDawg
LOL! Likely at least 4 in 10 people in SC wish the South had won the Civil War. The occupation of Charleston was horrible.
63
posted on
02/16/2016 10:58:03 AM PST
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
To: Psalm 144
64
posted on
02/16/2016 10:58:47 AM PST
by
freedomjusticeruleoflaw
(Western Civilization- whisper the words, and it will disappear. So let us talk now about rebirth.)
To: zeestephen
Total BS. I dont support Trump, but most of his supporters I know are northerners.
To: American in Israel
“The NWO is the logical end of federalism.”
Agreed. Statism with the capital S.
66
posted on
02/16/2016 11:00:00 AM PST
by
Psalm 144
("Of all the enemies to public liberty war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded" - James Madison)
To: Lib-Lickers 2
To: Georgia Girl 2
LOL! Likely at least 4 in 10 people in SC wish the South had won the Civil War. The occupation of Charleston was horrible.
To: Gunslingr3
Or who long for human chattel. That knife can cut a lot of ways... Had nothing to do with chattel. Had to do with who controlled the money and territory. As a British Newspaper Observed in 1862:
"The principle [of the Proclamation] is not that a human being cannot justly own another, but that he cannot own him unless he is loyal to the United States."
London Spectator, October 11, 1862
69
posted on
02/16/2016 11:07:20 AM PST
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: ladyjane
But 110% of Bernie supporters are glad the north won the war of aggression. They don't want states rights. They want free$hit. Which is itself another incarnation of slavery... for those people who have to work to pay for other people's "free $hit."
70
posted on
02/16/2016 11:08:46 AM PST
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: zeestephen
71
posted on
02/16/2016 11:09:13 AM PST
by
Angels27
To: DoodleDawg
Depends on whether you were the one third of the Confederate population being trod on or the two thirds doing the trodding. Of course your position is that Trodding on other people who seek independence is a good thing.
72
posted on
02/16/2016 11:10:36 AM PST
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: DiogenesLamp
Of course your position is that Trodding on other people who seek independence is a good thing. Big fan of the Nat Turner rebellion are you?
To: DoodleDawg
Compare the Confederate and US Constitutions. One barred the importation of slaves, the other prohibited a bar on the importation of slaves:
Confederate Constitution:
Sec. 9. (I) The importation of negroes of the African race from any foreign country other than the slaveholding States or Territories of the United States of America, is hereby forbidden; and Congress is required to pass such laws as shall effectually prevent the same.
(2) Congress shall also have power to prohibit the introduction of slaves from any State not a member of, or Territory not belonging to, this Confederacy.
US Constitution:
Section 9.
The migration or importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each person.
74
posted on
02/16/2016 11:11:39 AM PST
by
PAR35
To: zeestephen
75
posted on
02/16/2016 11:12:20 AM PST
by
HomerBohn
(Liberals and slinkies: they're good for nothing, but you smile as you shove them down the stairs.)
To: DiogenesLamp
Democrats have created a new plantation. Socialists will destroy what vestige of freedom we have left.
76
posted on
02/16/2016 11:12:38 AM PST
by
austingirl
(Sharia, taqiyya, jihad, and hijera- what more do you need to know about islam?)
To: zeestephen
They say that like it’s a bad thing.
77
posted on
02/16/2016 11:13:12 AM PST
by
uncitizen
(TRUMP THE SYSTEM)
To: redfreedom
Hmmm, this son of immigrants that came to America long after the War Between The States wishes the South had won. I am in the same boat. My family came here around 1900, and we didn't settle in a Confederate state.
The more I learn about this war, the more I think the wrong side won it.
78
posted on
02/16/2016 11:13:16 AM PST
by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: PAR35
The importation of negroes of the African race from any foreign country other than the slaveholding States or Territories of the United States of America, is hereby forbidden How do you interpret that as "barring slave imports" when it specifically says imports from the U.S. are allowed?
To: DoodleDawg
Delaware and Washington D.C. weren’t known for their slave breeding. Maryland was held in the Union by force, as was Missouri.
80
posted on
02/16/2016 11:25:00 AM PST
by
PAR35
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 141-157 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson