Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Valentine
-- Not in the context of the exchange.... clearly the entire discussion was about FEDERAL law. --

I understand your point, but you made numerous blanket statements that tend to mislead about the situation overall. As for me "going for it," the context of the exchange is on the viability of Trump's suits.

At least the IL election board rejected Cruz's argument that it lacked the power to get to the merits, and the only argument you have advanced in here is that all federal courts will rule without getting to the merits. In other words, your contention or speculation is so narrow, as to be useless.

169 posted on 02/16/2016 5:29:06 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

Actually, I had become confused between two different threads on essentially the same topic. On THIS one, I had not made the distinction. My bad.

As for the viability of any of Trumps threatened suits, I really do wish he would go for it, just to see him shut down.


175 posted on 02/16/2016 6:29:16 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt

Useless? I fail to see why. The election would be over before this issue is resolved on its merits. if any.


176 posted on 02/16/2016 6:31:18 AM PST by John Valentine (Deep in the Heart of Texas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson