Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: unlearner

http://www.businessinsider.com/law-professor-ted-cruz-is-not-eligible-to-be-president-2016-1

I agree with the author. Cruz is not NBC. I will not be voting for the Canadian either now or in 2018 if he runs for the Senate again.


160 posted on 02/15/2016 9:24:06 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]


To: jospehm20

“I agree with the author. Cruz is not NBC.”

The founders wrote letters to each other that unequivocally deny the Blackstone legal theory of applying British common law to our nation. We even went to war in 1812 over this very thing.

Further, in order for the law professor to be correct, the very founders who ratified the Constitution also enacted an unconstitutional law just 18 months later. The founders clearly thought it was constitutional and within the purview of Congress to decide if foreign born children of US citizens were “natural born citizens”. This proves that the founders regarded the “natural” part of the formula to be based on jus sanguinis and not jus soli. Their conception of natural law was based on the Law of Nations by Vattel and not British common law as Blackstone proposed some time later.

Under the applicable law, Cruz’s citizenship was conferred from his mother, which means it was naturally conferred rather than by a process of naturalization.


162 posted on 02/15/2016 9:39:08 PM PST by unlearner (RIP America, 7/4/1776 - 6/26/2015, "Only God can judge us now." - Claus Von Stauffenberg / Valkyrie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson