This death was very mysterious and politically convenient for too many people.
What was he doing in Texas? Who paid for the trip? Who else was there that day? What was the actual cause of death? Were there any signs of poison?
I don't care if the family wants an autopsy or not. When people die under even the most remotely suspicious circumstances, the family has no say in whether or not the coroner does an autopsy.
I'm not being paranoid. If this were Ruth Bader Ginsberg, an autopsy would have been performed even though I think she may have died 4 years ago and her mummified body is being propped up at the bench.
It is not unreasonable to demand an inquiry.
If there is any kind of question — and sometimes when there isn’t — there is an autopsy.
I don’t see any reason that that process should be changed.
” Were there any signs of poison? “
My thought is the same. Can it be possible he was poisoned? He did complained he was not feeling well that night.