Holder, Lynch, Johnson for Supreme Court justice?

WND ^ | 02/15/16 | Cheryl Chumley

[DoughtyOne]

[Buckeye McFrog]

It will be Lynch. Gives the Dems an opportunity to beat of the GOP for being racists conducting a war on women.

[beethovenfan]

I’m afraid you’re right.

[beethovenfan]

Lynch is just Holder with lady parts.

[E=MC²]

comrade nero-bama has already gotten two of his chosen onto the court. There isn’t even a Constitutional requirement for the number of SCOTUS justices; therefore, Scalia doesn’t even have to be replaced (and he is pretty well irreplaceable). The Republicans had better damn well block any and all of dear comrade’s nominations.

[CyberAnt]

“To keep her [Lynch] from having to do anything about Clinton, then don’t get another Attorney General appointed in time to do anything before the election.”

This is a great analysis. I totally get it. If Lynch is appointed to the Court, she is out of the Clinton issue altogether; no new attorney general will be appointed in time to do anything before the election.

Amazing.

[Organic Panic]

We have a winner


And after she's sworn in a bongo party will erupt and we will have the most minority of minority judges. The "first" everything.

[Clintonfatigued]

He wouldn’t dare. I’d like to see him try it.

Would it be wise for the Senate Republicans to act on a nomination which has no chance of winning and could backfire on the ‘Rat Party?

[Enlightened1]

Exactly!