Bill Pryor wanted to shame Roy Moore for his religious beliefs... Here is one section of him attempting to do so and Roy Moore standing firm. Litmus test, what litmus test? You decide.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BPPRCKmSQf4
Wrong link ... hate when I do that.. try this instead...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oWRDn7zsIbk
“Bill Pryor wanted to shame Roy Moore for his religious beliefs... Here is one section of him attempting to do so and Roy Moore standing firm. Litmus test, what litmus test? You decide.”
Do you know the legal reason why Pryor was asking those questions?
You say it was to shame Moore. That is not a legal reason.
Did not sound that way to me. Sounded to me like Moore asserted a far-fetched legal defense to contempt of court, or dereliction of duty.
And it sounded like Pryor was demonstrating that the defense did not have merit.
If Moore thought Pryor was merely trying to shame him, More or his attorney (if he had one) would have objected. But you will notice that Moore does not object to the questioning, in all likelihood because he knew they were legally relevant to the issues at hand.
Moore wanted to be civilly disobdient apparently in service of a higher law. That is all well and good, but you cannot also claim immunity from what the human law actually says.
If you want to be a hero, be a hero.