Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PIF

This is the exact reason to discard “what type of Supreme Court justices would they nominate” as a criteria in judging a candidate worthy of being President. Reagan had Sandra day oconnor and Scalia. W had Roberts and Alito. Saying a Cruz nominee (for example) is more likely to be conservative is completely unfounded “logic”. Justices change in unpredictable ways sometimes when they get in the Court. Cruz could nominate the most conservative person in the country and history says they may not remain that way on the Court.


87 posted on 02/14/2016 7:15:56 AM PST by Personal Responsibility (Forget church and state, we need a separation of press and state!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Personal Responsibility

Too many here just cannot see that point. If a candidate is conservative then, ipso facto, all appointed by him have to be the same and likely they imagine there is no difference between someone who is a conservative and someone who is an Originalist.

Too much magical thinking going on for me.


88 posted on 02/14/2016 7:25:41 AM PST by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson