Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Daffynition

It could have tremendously damaged Trump’s candidacy if he refused to discuss the topic the moderator asked him about. You know as well as I do that all the news following the debate would have been: “Trump showed utter inability to even briefly discuss Supreme Court appointments.” Within a day or two Cruz would have had an ad with a clip from the debate saying that Trump had proved to be utterly intellectually incapable of dealing with judicial appointments, so it would be a disaster to elect him. The presidential debate was precisely the time and place for this discussion. It seems to me, you are simply taking a cheap shot at Trump.


154 posted on 02/14/2016 8:29:49 PM PST by FenwickBabbitt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: FenwickBabbitt
**...It seems to me, you are simply taking a cheap shot at Trump.**

From the moment he announced, I've pretty much been on board with DJT.

But honestly, his veneer seems to be sustaining self-inflicted damage ....and I'm retreating to the *fence*. We'll see.

You are in the tank for him, I can respect that. Heck, anyone who has a star on the Walk of Fame, can't be all bad. ;D

I have an alibi

159 posted on 02/14/2016 11:22:27 PM PST by Daffynition (*Security, confiscate their coats. Get them out of here. It's 10 below zero out there ~DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson