Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WTFOVR

The problem is knowing what we knew at that time, was it a safer “bet” to leave Saddam in power and hope he would never create WMDs under the radar and pass them to terrorists? The intelligence I believe went as far as to say that Saddam must have been trying to at least make it look like he had WMDs to possibly scare Iran. You don’t necessarily wait for 100% confirmed intelligence to take action when the risk seems great.


3,055 posted on 02/14/2016 12:27:29 AM PST by JediJones (RUSH LIMBAUGH on TED CRUZ: "This is the closest in our lifetimes we have ever been to Ronald Reagan")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3041 | View Replies ]


To: JediJones

it all depends on what your definition of wmd is.if you consider thousands of barrels of poisonous gas wmds than sadaam had lots of it.he shipped it all to syria and we watch it very carefully even now.even the regime knows they have to watch it.


3,098 posted on 02/14/2016 4:25:02 AM PST by rodguy911 (Sarah Palin our secret weapon --Home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3055 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson