Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China FM voices 'serious concern' over possible deployment of U.S. shield in Korea [THAAD]
Korea Herald ^ | 2016-02-12

Posted on 02/12/2016 12:00:14 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster

China FM voices 'serious concern' over possible deployment of U.S. shield in Korea

Published : 2016-02-12 16:13

Updated : 2016-02-12 16:15

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi expressed "serious concern" over a decision by South Korea to begin formal talks with the United States to adopt an advanced U.S. missile defense system, according to China's foreign ministry on Friday.

Wang conveyed the concern to South Korean Foreign Minister Yun Byung-se during their meeting in Munich on the sidelines of international talks on Syria on Thursday, the Chinese ministry said in a statement.

"Minister Wang Yi expresses serious concern," the statement said.

Wang also told Yun that the possible deployment of the Terminal High-Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) battery in South Korea is "not conducive to taking the proper response to the current situation and is not conducive to maintaining peace and stability in the region."

Earlier this week, South Korea decided to begin talks with the U.S. about the deployment of the THAAD battery after North Korea defiantly launch a long-range rocket following its fourth nuclear test last month.

With North Korea continuing to develop its nuclear and missile arsenals, analysts in Seoul say South Korea has no choice but to adopt the THAAD battery, which would be deployed at a U.S. base in South Korea, home to about 28,500 American troops.

U.N. Security Council members remain divided over how to punish North Korea for its fourth nuclear test on Jan. 6, with China, one of five veto-wielding council members, reluctant to put crippling sanctions on North Korea.

During the meeting with Yun, Wang repeated China's lukewarm stance about imposing harsher penalties against North Korea.

"Sanctions are not an end in themselves," Wang told Yun, according to the statement.

China is North Korea's diplomatic and economic lifeline, but analysts say China's leadership is reluctant to impose tougher sanctions on North Korea because a sudden collapse of the regime could spark a refugee crisis at its border and lead to a pro-U.S., democratic Korea on its doorstep.

China's U.N. ambassador, Liu Jieyi, also made it clear that Beijing's priority is not imposing tougher sanctions against North Korea.

Liu told a U.N. meeting on Thursday that discussions about new sanctions against North Korea's nuclear test and rocket launch should be dealt with "in an objective, fair and neutral manner,"

according to a separate statement by the Chinese foreign ministry. (Yonhap)


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: china; dprk; nkorea; norks; pyongyang; redchina; republicofkorea; skorea; thaad
New reports in S. Korea say that the deployment of THAAD is pretty much a done deal. Initially, one battery will be deployed and a couple of more to follow later.

The deployment site is still under discussion. However, Defense Ministry spokesman made it clear that they would ignore concerns raised by neighboring countries when it comes to picking a deployment site. This remark is basically aimed at China, which has been making a lot of noise against the deployment.

1 posted on 02/12/2016 12:00:14 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster; AmericanInTokyo; Steel Wolf; nuconvert; MizSterious; endthematrix; ...

P!


2 posted on 02/12/2016 12:00:42 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China should take care of South Korea


3 posted on 02/12/2016 12:15:06 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Trump for me. I want to see Hillary, Bernie or any demoncrap crushed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Merkel and Obama will take the refugees. Damn, that just might be true!


4 posted on 02/12/2016 12:17:55 AM PST by stocksthatgoup (Trump for me. I want to see Hillary, Bernie or any demoncrap crushed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Ah, most impolite of you not to expose your neck to our irrational lunatic friend here.


5 posted on 02/12/2016 12:53:41 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I may be in the minority. But I support this move along with additional U.S. forces, and more strategic hardware. If only we had a Regan like type leader, to stand up to China. And it’s proxies.


6 posted on 02/12/2016 1:24:08 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Vote Tom Hoefling of America's Party for President the only person to restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cva66snipe

Ping


7 posted on 02/12/2016 1:24:55 AM PST by StoneWall Brigade (Vote Tom Hoefling of America's Party for President the only person to restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
I don't follow your stream of consciousness.
8 posted on 02/12/2016 3:37:01 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Tough noodles, China.

Do something about the nutcase in North Korea,then maybe we’ll talk.


9 posted on 02/12/2016 3:38:18 AM PST by exit82 ("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

North Korea is testing H-bombs and ballistic missiles...and China doesn’t want to impose sanctions (??)

I think China is using North Korea as a military proxy.

China will continue to act as a business competitor, acting like a pseudo-capitalist and a “normal” player in global markets...meanwhile North Korea is free to act as the bad guy and freely display its military intentions.

They are one and the same communist block. One side makes all the money then gives it to the other side to spend on tactical strike weapons.


10 posted on 02/12/2016 3:59:07 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd
It is obvious that China uses N. Korea as its bloody henchman. China had done even worse in the past. China used genocidal Pol Pot's Cambodia as her henchman against the communist Viet Nam after Sino-Vietnamese War in 1979. That scheme collapsed only when Vietnamese invaded Cambodia, and deposed Pol Pot. And who instigated such a move? The ever-so pragmatic and reform-minded Deng Xiao-ping.

China loves bloody henchman.

11 posted on 02/12/2016 4:12:12 AM PST by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

I do believe that its inevitable that Thaad will be deployed there.
What I’m really waiting for is the other shoe to drop when Japan deploys it as well.


12 posted on 02/12/2016 5:02:19 AM PST by bill1952 (taxes don't hurt the rich, they keep YOU from becoming rich.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kidd

The Chinese poker face on NK has gotten rather thin.
It’s long past time for this to cost something.


13 posted on 02/12/2016 5:07:09 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

Unless China is planning to launch missiles at South Korea I don’t see how this is a concern.

L


14 posted on 02/12/2016 5:08:24 AM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerLikesRooster

China is getting close to military tech-parity with us. It’s not like they couldn’t just wave their hands and the missile shield be rendered much less effective. They should shut the piehole.


15 posted on 02/12/2016 5:09:54 AM PST by Lazamataz (I'm an Islamophobe??? Well, good. When it comes to Islam, there's plenty to Phobe about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson