Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: austinaero

Actually the Constitution very CLEARLY says ED is for public use, and the project Cruz was discussing (a border wall) would clearly fall into the public use category.


54 posted on 02/11/2016 5:05:36 PM PST by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

“Actually the Constitution very CLEARLY says ED is for public use, and the project Cruz was discussing (a border wall) would clearly fall into the public use category.”

And a parking lot is not used by the public and it’s tax revenues are not used by the public?


56 posted on 02/11/2016 5:07:09 PM PST by austinaero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson