Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: vbmoneyspender
You said "Keystone could be considered a public use because it is a common carrier, much like power lines are considered appropriate takings under the 5th Amendment"

The attorneys arguing FOR the actual pipeline disagree.

But that is irrelevant to the fact Cruz fought for the pipeline as a jobs program.

113 posted on 02/11/2016 9:08:06 PM PST by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: moehoward

You’re hanging your hate on the opinion of one deputy attorney general who doesn’t represent the pipeline. That is hardly conclusive. Maybe you might want to read the Reason article I posted earlier. It gives a fair summation of the both the pros and cons of arguing that Keystone is a proper subject of eminent domain.


116 posted on 02/11/2016 11:05:43 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: moehoward
Though eminent domain statutes vary in each state, TransCanada seems to have made itself legally impenetrable in the half dozen states along the Keystone XL pipeline route by claiming "common carrier" status. . . .

Oil interests in Montana and Oklahoma have played the common carrier card to their advantage by forcing TransCanada to add on-ramps in those states so domestically harvested oil can be shipped along the Keystone XL. . . .

In Texas, it was the state's Railroad Commission that granted TransCanada common carrier status. Most landowners along the route in eastern Texas, assuming Keystone XL would be hauling conventional oil, were content to take the buyout offer.

118 posted on 02/11/2016 11:13:47 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

To: moehoward
Also, hopefully you are aware that the Nebraska Supreme Court upheld the Keystone pipeline being run thru Nebraska.

The Keystone XL pipeline has a valid route through Nebraska.

The state Supreme Court on Friday cleared a clog in the path of the proposed crude oil pipeline, reversing a lower court decision that struck down the law that former Gov. Dave Heineman used to approve the project's route.

In a split vote, the high court vacated Lancaster County District Judge Stephanie Stacy’s decision that found the 2012 law (LB1161) unconstitutional.

The high court said the landowners who brought the lawsuit, represented by Omaha attorney Dave Domina, failed to convince a supermajority of the court they have standing to challenge the law -- allowing it to stand by default.

119 posted on 02/11/2016 11:18:56 PM PST by vbmoneyspender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson