Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RicocheT

“You can’t look at the overall budget needs and pull money from cybersecurity if that means lessening security fixes and updates. His testimony indicates the IRS did just that.”

They all do that. I own a small IT security company. Business won’t spend money on security because its the “right” thing to do. They won’t do it to protect Grandmas money or healthcare. They will only do it if the government forces them or the penalty for a breach is incredibly severe. Even then many of them will gamble that the breach won’t happen on their watch.

Been there done that.

We’ve also done business with the government. With a few exceptions they are worse. I’ve seen them eliminate all security funding on contracts.

There is a reason most of us have had our data stolen multiple times.


6 posted on 02/11/2016 10:37:36 AM PST by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: driftdiver

Thanks driftdiver for the inside truth. I guess all of us that have any sensitive data that ends up in government, financial and health related databases are cooked, screwed and blued.

I’m not ready to go back to stone age living, so I just have to examine all of my bank and other account statements for monkey business every time these come in. Maybe paperless account statements are a dangerous choice.


8 posted on 02/11/2016 11:22:34 AM PST by RicocheT (Only a few prefer liberty--the majority seek nothing more than fair masters. Sallust, Histories)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson