Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LouD
The intention of the “native born” clause was to ensure that we do not elect someone with divided loyalties, and I do not believe that anyone can reasonably assert that Cruz owes any allegiance to Canada.

That statement gives you away. You say you do not believe that anyone can reasonably assert that Cruz owes any allegiance to Canada. The eligibility clause does not say that each candidate must be tested to find out if it can be reasonably asserted that they owe any allegiance to another nation. The Constitution was written to exclude a group of citizens that might have any possibility of a divided allegiance. We do not even get to test Ted Cruz because he is already not eligible.

310 posted on 02/11/2016 10:46:40 AM PST by higgmeister ( In the Shadow of The Big Chicken! Trump 2016 - and Dude, Cruz ain't bona fide either)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies ]


To: higgmeister

Once upon a time, conservatives believed in the doctrine of original intent, in which judges interpreted the Constitution based upon the intention of the founders - not the expediency of a short term politicialy motivated desire by a buffoonish faux conservative candidate to vanquish his leading challenger from the race.


311 posted on 02/11/2016 11:00:28 AM PST by LouD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson