Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: zerosix

You’re correct about not being interested in “nominating sure losers.” Dole, McCain, Romney.....”


I’ve often wondered why McCain and Romney did not sue Buckwheat on the NBC issue. They both were denied the Presidency due to obama’s victory, and therefore had “standing”. If they had, and exposed the usurper, everything would be different....everything.


267 posted on 02/10/2016 8:12:01 PM PST by AFret.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies ]


To: AFret.
I've often wondered why McCain and Romney did not sue Buckwheat on the NBC issue. They both were denied the Presidency due to obama's victory, and therefore had "standing". If they had, and exposed the usurper, everything would be different....everything.

One word, Kennedy, as in Justice Kennedy, one of the dumbest members of that Court yet seen, perhaps only Souter was more idiotic.

Of course they also had to consider Roberts, as in Chief Justice Roberts, the only Court member who has sufficient existing evidence for blackmail to be a plausible method of coercion. Thank you Bush43 and Ted Cruz for inflicting this menace on America.

Even if there was a path to a decision with adequate "standing" according to Roberts, we face the dismal prospect of having SIX of nine justices unfit to clerk in a boondock county courthouse, let alone be trusted with interpreting John Jay's contribution to Article II Section 1 qualifications of the President.

Ironically, I feel that Roberts accidentally came to the best answer by punting it back to We The People to kick around for ourselves. I cannot think of a reason to entrust that Court with something this monumental. So perhaps it is best left alone.

273 posted on 02/10/2016 8:29:23 PM PST by Democratic-Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

To: AFret.
They didn't sue on the issue for the same reason they couldn't get elected - they were/are the "go along to get along" part of the Establishment Party!

Remember, at least I do, McCain declared he would NOT criticize Obama - on anything when he was the candidate and since that time (in 2008) he has yet to do so!

Romney, for his part tried to criticize Obama during the 2012 election but got bitch-slapped by Candy Crowley, of all things during a debate and never again had the nerve to try again!

I'm certain that all the "know-it-all" 30-somethings at the RNC told both candidates never to confront Obama as he is black and the moderates in both parties don't like to hear such things!!

The only people that "don't like to hear such things" are the other 30-something "metrosexual males" and the Obama campaign!

277 posted on 02/10/2016 8:48:53 PM PST by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson