If birthers would read the whole paragraph in context then it's pretty clear what the court is saying. Children born in the U.S. of citizen parents are natural-born citizens. There isn't any doubt in that, and I'm not saying there is. But the court goes further and acknowledges that there is more than one definition of who is a natural-born citizen. And that while the court recognizes that there are those who disagree with the expanded definition it also makes it clear that it is not their place as part of the Minor v. Happersett decision to say whether those other definitions are right or wrong. So no, the Supreme Court did not say that only children born in the U.S. of citizen parents are natural-born citizens. It says that it is the only unquestionable way of qualifying for natural-born citizenship.