I'm pretty sure the story is that he was drinking beer in the park with his buddies one night.
Not that I condone underage drinking, and not that I condone trespassing in a public park after operating hours... but it hardly disqualifies the man for running from President.
If that's the standard we set on boyhood misdeeds, then 40 years later I shouldn't even be allowed out of the house without one of those ankle bracelets to track my every move.
I cannot make 'heads or tails' out of what was in the article.... I was left wondering what is the point?