Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DeakonSmith
For a small group of Senators opposing an establishment majority, you restrict the definition of “winning” to only nullifying the majority? All else is a failure in your eyes?

And I am not digging up dirt by discussing Trump's bankruptcies, he is running on his business acumen.

136 posted on 02/10/2016 11:11:00 AM PST by 5thGenTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]


To: 5thGenTexan

Not at all... to both of your questions. I don’t even relate the definition of winning to “only nullifying the majority”. I would associate success with winning but even at, it’s not restrictive. Nobody is always a winner (except for maybe the coin-toss queen. lol). I find that question to be quite disjunctive. I also didn’t mean to insinuate that you were digging up dirt. I was trying to say that my opinion would be different if that were the case as opposed to questioning a topic that the candidates raised themselves. I don’t personalize objective discussion. That’s probably why our opinions differ but that’s purely speculation on my part. So back to my initial opinion. The OP has identified a fair political strategy and there’s no reason to find it otherwise. You’re free to disagree. I’m not trying to change your opinion nor am I seeking validation.


140 posted on 02/10/2016 11:41:22 AM PST by DeakonSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson