Posted on 02/09/2016 9:02:37 PM PST by Elderberry
In other words, will she do the honorable thing? Don’t hold your breath.
The Founders did the best they could, but ultimately corruption takes over, as it’s doing now.
In the past two thousand years, how often have governments voluntarily surrendered power back to the people?
She’ll do as she is told and like it.
Is this a serious article?
Of course not.
Does a bear drop Obama likenesses in the woods?
We know how Sodamachine will vote. No discussion is necessary.
The founding fathers provided a mechanism in the Constitution to remove bad judges of which there have been hundreds in the history of the country.
Despite all the bad judges in our history, only fifteen federal judges have been impeached. Of those fifteen: eight were convicted by the Senate, four were acquitted by the Senate, and three resigned before an outcome at trial.Feb 21, 2015.
So, Congress is to blame for the bad judges because like in so many other ways they don’t do their job. It’s just go along and get along and make deposits into one of my bank accounts!
What a joke. She will sit there and hear the case. Does anyone actually think they are hung up on quaint rules?
We are like some old fashioned boxer following the rules squared off against some crazed cage death match champion MMA lunatic.
The very idea of the article is silly. Since when does that side follow ANY rule or tradition?
Of course not.
She’s a Democrat. Of course she won’t do the right thing. She’ll do the Democrat Party thing.
No, she will not.
Erickson & Leon Wolf fired Daniel Horowitz for his views on amnesty & “starving brown people”
True
Why should she?
The liberal “justices” have never recused themselves from anything, anywhere, and nobody ever, ever calls them on it.
Never.
She is never, ever going to take herself out of anything, and only fools and idiots think she will.
the real question is should there still be a president Obama?
Exactly. She knows that nobody, Nobody, NOBODY is going to bring the issue to a head and make a deal out of it.
It is precisely why liberalism has been spreading like a cancer since the 1960’s. When liberals, ignore, bend, or break rules, nobody calls them to account.
Nobody, Never.
Liberals may be brainless, beady-eyed thugs in an entire spectrum of ways, but even the most primitive criminal learns to spot weakness.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg presided over a homosexual ‘marriage’ before sitting on the Obergefell case that forced so many to recognize homosexual ‘marriage’ as a Constitutional right. She never considered recusing herself in that case.
So no, it is likely Sotomayor will not recuse herself.
This case is a big deal, much more so than any state primary. But it’s unfortunately being kept under the media radar:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3395091/posts?page=3#3
Did she recuse herself on homosexual “marriage”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.