Posted on 02/09/2016 12:53:14 PM PST by Hojczyk
Thanks onyx.
I tried to see it when I heard about it, but it was down by my late morning!
It will be fun to see the totals tonight. Maybe they used some poll numbers to create a practice display. I would rather think that than a fixed election!
;)
He gets 70 pct of the delegates for only 28 pct of the vote? And gives 3 delegates here for 11 pct and none for 9 pct? That seems way off.
Likely.
If Trump wins, he wins, just as Cruz actually won Iowa, no matter what Trump and his people say.
However, if he gets a mere 28 percent after polling much higher than that, it will be the second straight state in which he will have underperformed. Should that occur, it should be of some concern to the Trump people.
537.
That's my guess too.
That’s just one poll—others have him in the low 30s.
He was #7 in the group for the number of actual voter contacts made (”ground game”), so it shouldn’t be surprising if his actual number comes in below the polls, which probably pretty fairly reflect the actual situation.
My guess is that they were testing and this is what their algorithm came up with.
We’ll see.
Actually I was pretty happy with it. :-)
As I have always said here I have no faith in polls ever. If I ever do take a poll which I have not done for years I toy with them. Most people I know mislead pollsters. I resent pollsters nosing into my business at dinner time with multiple choice questions without any option to answer what I really think.
Hillary's next...
Too Funny! 8^)
Cruz would have won NH obviously because of this. The results should be thrown out. (Acting like a trumpeter)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.