Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: smoothsailing
Baker says the FBI has not, however, "publicly acknowledged the specific focus, scope or potential targets of any such proceedings." He ends the one-paragraph letter by saying that the FBI cannot say more "without adversely affecting on-going law enforcement efforts."

Can't state the names of potential targets? Everyone knows it is Hillary and maybe others. How can compromise an investigation when everyone knows Hillary is the target?

59 posted on 02/08/2016 5:53:06 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SeaHawkFan

Somewhere, James McDougal is laughing.


69 posted on 02/08/2016 5:58:53 PM PST by blackdog (There is no such thing as healing, only a balance between destructive and constructive forces.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

To: SeaHawkFan

It most likely comes down to the semantic designation of terms. Is Hillary currently a subject of the investigation or a target (subject that is nearly certain to be indicted) ?


70 posted on 02/08/2016 6:00:51 PM PST by erlayman (yw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson