To: Yosemitest
Shocking surprise from where? Are you completely ignorant of legal precedent? Courts have long since adjudicated eminent domain for redevelopment under the term ‘public interest’ and it’s settled law.
26 posted on
02/08/2016 8:25:51 AM PST by
Lagmeister
( false prophets shall rise, and shall show signs and wonders Mark 13:22)
To: Lagmeister
Those
'Courts' are
WRONG !
Source:
James Madison, who wrote the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, had a more moderate view,
and struck a compromise that sought to at least protect property rights somewhat by explicitly mandating compensation and using the term "public use" rather than "public purpose," "public interest", or "public benefit".[5]
The Fifth Amendment imposes limitations on the exercise of eminent domain:the taking must be for public use
and just compensation must be paid.
31 posted on
02/08/2016 9:05:34 AM PST by
Yosemitest
(It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Lagmeister
Courts have long since adjudicated eminent domain for redevelopment under the term 'public interest' and it's settled law. It sounds like you're happy about that. Trump seems to be.
Conservatives? Not so much.
48 posted on
02/08/2016 10:44:52 AM PST by
St_Thomas_Aquinas
(Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
To: Lagmeister
How recently was the precedent set, do you know? I ask because it wasn’t that long ago that Walmart was slapped down when they were saying they needed certain property to be condemned for public good, bringing jobs was one thing.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson