To: Trumpinator
The Kelo case said that the Constitution did not prevent a state or city from using eminent domain the way that New London did. It did not say that Congress or states could not pass a law against such a use or that such a law would be unconstitutional.
47 posted on
02/08/2016 9:50:48 AM PST by
CA Conservative
(Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
To: CA Conservative
It is just an assumption that Kelo would override such laws. If not the case that is a great thing to be able to short circuit that decision.
48 posted on
02/08/2016 10:13:57 AM PST by
Trumpinator
("Are you Batman?" the boy asked. "I am Batman," Trump said.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson